CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications

To: "'4O3A'" <4o3a@t-com.me>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications
From: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 07:21:23 +1000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Agreed Ranko, 

A scoring system that favours Single ops to compete in a Multi Op contest
(WRTC) and disadvantages those who operate Multi Ops obviously has major
flaws - 

Considering the format was  M2 from the last WRTC it is even further flawed.


Regards 

Trent VK4TS 


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
4O3A
Sent: Friday, 29 May 2015 2:13 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications

Once more I would like to ask our German friends to reconsider two important
parts of rules:

1.    Qualification period. It is really too short. Needless to repeat 
reasons why it should be longer.
2.    Weight for categories - to correct MS weight from 0.9 to 1.0, as 
it was earlier. As majority of active contest stations will try to qualify
for WRTC, this will "disqualify" MS  for next two years. If it won't be
changed, or WRTC qualification  or MS participation in next two years must
be sacrificed.

I know it is hard/impossible to make everything to be ideal, and will not
impress my personal opinion about other details I disagree, but those two
are "infrastructural" :-)

73
Ranko


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>