CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category

To: <sawyered@earthlink.net>, <ve2tzt@arrl.net>,<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category
From: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Reply-to: w0yk@msn.com
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:45:34 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Welcome to contesting.   You may be interested to hear about my
> progression of increased scores and standings which runs 
> completely counter to the theory that SO2R is worthy of a new 
> category.  I have been seriously doing SOABLP SO2R contesting 
> since 2001. 

Snip

> The point is IT'S THE ANTENNAS and LOCATION that make the 
> difference in many cases.  Not SO2R.  I wouldn't hesitate in 
> an instant to go to SO1R from my current station vs. SO2R 
> from my old station.  SO2R is a red herring..its the whole 
> package that wins.not SO2R.  I love SO2R and would not want 
> to give it up, but for those in the contesting community that 
> keep focusing on SO2R as a separate category, it just IS NOT 
> the BIG EQUALIZER.IT'S THE ANTENNAS!

Excellent testimony, Ed (N1UR).  Unfortunately, it will probably have little
impact on the mindless SO1R vs. SO2R rants.

73,
Ed - W0YK

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>