CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks
From: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:58:01 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In my recent post I said:

"So when we double the frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric
absorption decreases by one fourth. It would decrease even more (by one
sixteenth) on 40m."

I should made it more clear by saying:

"So when we double the frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric
absorption decreases to 1/4 of the 160m absorption. It would decrease even
more (to one sixteenth of the 160m absorption) on 40m.

Thanks to Pete N4ZR for catching that.

Carl
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>