Pete,
Greater sense of privacy and more protective EU legislation generally. The
UK regulator, for example, does not even publish amateurs' addresses and
other related information.
The FCC has the email addresses for every ham, but does not publish them in
the public database even though it publishes the email addresses for most
of the other license holders in the other services that use the same (ULS)
database. My business email address is on the FCC website in hundreds of
places associated with other types of licenses, but privacy concerns do
not apply on the business side.
73, Dave K3ZJ
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:06 AM Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
wrote:
> During last weekend's 10-M contest, I worked a DL station who was loud
> but T8, with a pronounced buzz on his signal. I went to e-mail him to
> tell him about it, but alas - no e-mail on any of the usual sites. In
> hunting for him, I found a number of DL stations that omitted e-mail
> addresses from their QRZ and QRZCQ pages. What gives?
>
> --
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|