CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Futurer

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Futurer
From: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:44:26 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yeah - self-policing really works.

Just listen to 7255 and 3840 out here on the west coast.

You hear the 'F-bomb' every other word.  Racial, anti-semitic, hate
speech.  Filthy music being played all the time.

But if this goes through, self policing will work OK, right?? 73
Tom W7WHY



On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Jeff AC0C <keepwalking188@ac0c.com> wrote:

> When was the last time where you saw someone in favor of 11708
> specifically address the concerns of the anti-11708 group regarding ADS,
> Winlink, etc? Maybe I have just missed it?
>
> 1. I still don't have a crystal clear answer on the ability of a 3rd party
> to monitor a P4 exchange.  How are we supposed to self police?
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>