CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?

To: Stephen Bloom <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:10:32 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I use a single vertical, DX Engineering 66ft vertical. I am getting 3 more
for a 4 square.

It gets out fairly well. Probably won't burn up anyone's S meter but I get
good reports.

For 160 (for now) I use an inverted L but that will be upgraded this summer
with something phased. I do have Beverages for receive which in my opinion
are more important.

Ria
N2RJ

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Stephen Bloom <sbloom@acsalaska.net> wrote:

> I'll throw this out there ...
>
> 80M and 160M antennas!
>
> Most of us probably know the theory, but I want to know what has actually
> worked and hasn't ..and ..why
>
> Competitively, at this point in the cycle, we're gonna live and die on the
> low bands.  For the most part, 40M and below, we know it's some variation
> on
> heavy metal high in the air .. for 80 and 160M, I'm curious, and I bet
> others are too about
>
> 1)  For the "big guns" and those trying to be, what are you doing?  Are any
> of you having success with 80M yagis, and if so, how are you keeping them
> in
> the air and on the air?  For 80M and 160M, 4 square arrays?  4 "tower
> verticals" or Dipole arrays off a single tower?  2 phased verticals?
> Receiving antennas?  How do you keep Moose from ravaging your Beverages?
> (OK, maybe that is an Alaska only problem!)
>
> 2)  For the people on smaller lots.  Suggestions, ways to improve
> performance realistically.
>
> Thanks/73
> Steve KL7SB
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> K1AR via CQ-Contest
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:08 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?
>
> OK everyone -- unless someone has something new and profound to offer, I
> suggest we move on to a new thread. How about a discussion on leveling the
> playing field in contesting? Or, perhaps the impact of spotting, RBN and
> packet  on contest operating? Maybe we can debate the merits of combining
> assisted  and unassisted.
>
> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Something new folks? Anything? Please?
>
> Thank you.
>
> 73, John, K1AR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>