Below
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Jim - How might a requirement to cease use of the first call after a
> second call is used affect the ability for some number of stations to each
> make a few contacts with one call and then switch to another call to make a
> few more contacts?
>
> I used 100 as an example. The fact is that 25 guys or fewer with two call
> signs each who might not have otherwise turned the radio on could almost
> guarantee victory for the one of their choosing out of 3 stations sending
> the highest number late Sunday afternoon/evening. I am not talking about
> serious participants who would sacrifice their serious effort to help a
> fellow club member.
>
> I am not so worried about it. I am just supposing that what could already
> be accomplished now would be twice as easy and more likely to occur as a
> result..
>
> There are a lot more what if's that I wont even mention.
>
> 73...Stan, K5GO
>
If those stations did it with the same operator and the same rig,
technically one set of QSO's is illegal under the current rules. They just
get away with it because they never submit one or both logs and ARRL has no
way to relate the call signs. If one is not going to submit logs, we're
not talking about the rules anyway.
73, Guy
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|