CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] qualification casus

To: <k1to@wrtc2014.org>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] qualification casus
From: "Andy V. Melanyin" <ua3dpx@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:40 +0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Dan,
just notised that there is the rule:
5. Qualifying Event Score Calculation
The Event Score for each qualifying event will be calculated based on the 
following formula. Event Score = (Contest value) x (Category weighting factor) 
x (Published final score / Maximum score in applicant's category from Selection 
Area*) 

* If the "Maximum published score in applicant's category from Selection Area" 
is lower than the highest published score in any "lower" category from the same 
Selection Area, substitute the higher score as the reference score using the 
following category order and revised formula below.

To my mind and most mindes of my friends (UA4FER, UA9BA, 4L5A etc.) this rule 
is not giving real picture.

How You can compare MIX category with mono mode (CW, SSB) ? THEY ARE DIFFERENT 
CATEGORIES

How You can compare SO category in ARRL DX with MS or M2 categories? FOR SO in 
arrl allowed to change bands to use double CQ technology using SO2R. 

(And for MS - You can make only 6 band changing in an hour) 

Where is the advantage for MS before SO in ARRL DX CONTEST ?

Look for instance the claimed scores in last ARRL CW for EU RUSSIA:

1. RU1A (OP RX3APM) - MORE THEN 2M POINTS

2. RL3A (OP RL3FT) - MORE THEN 1.5 M POINTS

3. 1-ST IN M2 UA4M (M2) - a bit more then 1M POINTS

4. 1-ST IN MS  RM3F (MS) - LESS THEN 1M POINS



I think it is not objective to mix and compare scores of different categories 
because they are really different !!!

What can be done to correct this sellection mistake ??

73! Andy UA3DPX/RM3F
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] qualification casus, Andy V. Melanyin <=