Ken,
I repeat, your statement is flat out misrepresenting the data that's in the
logs. You can't analyze data that's not there. You can argue as much as you
want, but if logs contain close to zero percent US stations working other US
stations, the analysis you demand is impossible and useless.
For the record, I only operate from VE3 and have no reason to object the
current rules. However, I do believe that reasonable proposals are being made;
I have a problem when such proposals are being pushed back with bogus
pseudo-scientific arguments or "if it ain't broken don't fix it".
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate
autocorrect.
> On Jul 22, 2016, at 8:09 PM, Ken Claerbout <k4zw@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> No one suggesting a change has yet to show what their proposal does to
> scores, good and bad, using log data or whatever they choose Until that
> happens, these discussions are mostly a waste of time, and year after year as
> happens now, we'll have all this hand wringing and nothing will change.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|