CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN question

To: Tibor Finta <tibfin@gmail.com>, "CQ-Contest@contesting.com" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN question
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:02:25 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think you're looking at the magic of propagation at work.

>From my little pistol station (100 watts and wires in W1 land), HG and F 
>stations are easy to work.   A UA9 deep in zone 17, however...that's good DX 
>for me.

Also, my path to that part of Russia goes further north than the path to 
western or central Europe, and geomagnetic conditions this weekend were 
disturbed.

-- 
Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+mda=n1en.org@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
Tibor Finta
Sent: Thursday, 20 February, 2025 18:44
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] RBN question

Dear Experts,

I created a quick statistics sheet on RBN figures of the ARRL DX CW contest.
I took 4  SOSB 20M stations: HG0Y, HG5E, TM4W and UA9YBA.
Here is how many times they were spotted by RBN in North America:
HG0Y:  14236
HG5E:  16648
TM4W:  16223
UA9YBA: 4918

According to 3830scores.com and contestonlinescore.com pages these are the QSO 
numbers:
HG0Y:   1005
HG5E:    902
TM4W:   1139
UA9YBA:  967

My question: how could it be that three stations were spotted by RBN three 
times more than UA9YBA?
I listened to UA9YBA at the end of the contest and his CQ was absolutely
correct: "CQ UA9YBA UA9YBA TEST".

73:
Tibor
HG5E / HA1AH
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>