Great idea. I'll take a lifetime sub to NCJ.
Matt--K7BG
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-cq-contest@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lee Hiers
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:54 AM
To: k1zz@arrl.org; k1ro@arrl.org
Cc: w4rh@arrl.org; Sandy Donahue; w5jbp@arrl.org;
cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ
You guys may not have seen this mentioned on the contest reflector,
or may not have given it serious consideration, but I think you
should.
Should contest coverage be effectively removed from QST, as I feel it
will be, why not offer the members the choice of which periodical
they receive?
I know other membership organizations do this (such as the NRA).
At this point, I think I would choose NCJ over QST, as there is
generally little in QST of interest to me other than contest
coverage.
Would this not represent additional cost savings to the League?
73 de Lee
--
Lee Hiers, AA4GA
Cornelia, GA
lee@dixieliner.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|