[CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed"

CQ-Contest

[CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed"

Subject:	[CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed"
From:	w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date:	Fri Oct 11 11:33:22 2002

How about QDQ "Don't QSL"?

Zack W9SZ


On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, John Laney wrote:

> Re:  Proposed Q signal QNQ for please do not QSL.  Please try to pick
> another signal since QNQ already has a very well known and defined
> meaning used daily on CW traffic nets.
> 
> Also, it would be helpful for you to put your callsign in your signature
> since it is not indicated in your e-mail address.
> 
> 73,
> 
> 
> John, K4BAI/8P9HT/8P9Z.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", jsschuster@snet.net [CQ-Contest] Re: [CQ-Contest]"No QSL Needed", Tim Makins, EI8IC [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", John Laney [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Zack Widup <= [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Tack Kumagai Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Mike Urich, KA5CVH Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Art Popoff Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Mike Urich, KA5CVH Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Mike, VK4DX

Previous by Date:	[CQ-Contest] 27-day Space Weather Outlook Table ???, Dale L Martin
Next by Date:	[CQ-Contest] TM5C - Europe's No.1 M/S - short of ops!, f5vco@tiscali.fr
Previous by Thread:	[CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", John Laney
Next by Thread:	[CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Tack Kumagai
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]