To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-590S Contesting performance question |
From: | BRYON PAUL n0ah VEAL <bryonveal@msn.com> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:18:13 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I have heard from a few contesters that the RX performance of the TS-590S is excellent for the money, and very comparable to radios in a higher $$$ class. We have an Icom Pro IIII. For low band CW DX and contesting, does anyone have an opinion which of these two different radios are better performers? Especially for 80/160M. Feel free to reply to n0ah@arrl.net. 73- Bryon "Paul" Veal MAED FCC Amateur Radio License-N0AH n0ah@arrl.net Certified ARRL Volunteer Wireless Technology Instructor Acres Green Elementary School Amateur Radio Club Trustee - KD0NIV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea, Joe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] California QSO Party: Webinar Tuesday, John Miller |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WAEDC SSB 2011 - Final call for logs, DL8WPX |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-590S Contesting performance question, BRYON PAUL n0ah VEAL |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |