| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to redraw the CQ zone map? |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:56:46 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 12/4/2025 6:18 AM, Barry W2UP wrote: Consider the primary US zones, 3, 4, and 5. Zone 5 is roughly 500 miles wide. Zone 4 is roughly 1600 miles wide, and zone 3 is about 1000 miles wide. It is my understanding that CQ Zones were established on the basis of population or ham licenses. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to redraw the CQ zone map?, David Gilbert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to redraw the CQ zone map?, Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to redraw the CQ zone map?, Steve London |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to redraw the CQ zone map?, Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |