On 11/14/2025 6:03 PM, Tim Duffy wrote:
George makes the case that Sweepstakes remains the most egalitarian contest on the
calendar—favoring smart operators, not just big stations. He explains why the
one-QSO-per-station rule levels the field, why a fan vertical in a park can still net 900 contacts,
and how Sunday “begging” for casual operators becomes a strategic art.
Yes, and thanks for making that very important point, at a time when
Sweepstakes participation is falling, as an increasing number of it's
more active participants are aging out (health issues, moving to smaller
housing, and becoming an SK. ARRL's Contest Advisory Committee has been
soliciting input from our constituents (each member of the Committee is
appointed by the Director off our ARRL Division), and one of the
misguided inputs we've been getting is to allow QSOs with the same
station on each band. Another proposal, which George has also shown to
be a bad idea, is to shorten the contest -- that's another element that
evens the playing field.
There have been other ideas put forth, two of which could be the most
promising, are recruiting more operators to contesting, and for the
League and the contest community to do a LOT more promotion. Please
share any ideas you have with your representative. N6DE, the major force
behind the success of CQP, has been very proactive, finding,
encouraging, coordinating expeditions to our many counties with few if
any active hams, and even arranging help with the portable setups, with
the goal of making a sweep of California counties within reach of most
serious competitors, and on both modes!
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|