On 02/18/25 4:19 PM, K9MA wrote:
On 2/18/2025 10:56 AM, Mike VE9AA ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
Scenario #2
me: TEST VE9AA
you: K4SBZ
me: K4HBZ 5NN <exchange>
you: K4SBZ (or if you're adamant, MAYBE send it twice in this
scenario-could be QRM, QRN etc)
me: K4SBZ 5NN <exchange>
you: 5NN <exchange>
me: TU VE9AA
In scenario #2, I busted your call but you withheld the exchange
until I corrected it. You heard your callsign come back to you.
This is the most efficient way to ensure "acks" from both
ends.
I agree, and that's what I usually do. The exception is when I know
I'm working a very skilled operator, and signals are strong in which
case I'll just send my call before the exchange. Then I better hear my
call come back correctly.
73,
Scott K9MA
I have an 'extra' key for "DE K8LX". Seems to work well to efficiently
correct callsign misunderstandings in almost any situation.
-Steve K8LX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|