CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 599

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 599
From: "Mike DeChristopher" <mike@n0hi.net>
Reply-to: mike@n0hi.net
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:53:39 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm happy for the 59 on phone because it generally stops operators from
saying "please copy" (which is not only pointless, but takes longer to say
than "five nine").

On CW, it does let us know the exchange is coming, but I could do without
it.  Anyway, most of the casual contesters send it even when it isn't
required.

-- 
Mike DeChristopher, N0HI
http://www.n0hi.net



> The same way you get to Carnegie Hall.
>
> "Practice, practice, practice"
>
> 73
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 6:26 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 599
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
>
>> Yes.  "Five Nine..."
>
>
>
> It's a waste of time.  When I hear my callsign, it
> usually means the important bit is next - and in
> CQWW there's nothing to listen for.
>
> How does anyone cope with SS and Field Day?
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>