Hola Geo,
Yes indeed. I think very competitive logs should be sent no later than 24 hours
after the contest ends, preferablybly, if possible, right after the contest
ends.
73,
Martin LU5DX
Enviado desde BlueMail
En mar 13, 2017 10:05 a. m., en 10:05 a. m., Jorge Diez - CX6VM
<cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com> escribió:
>Hello
>
>5 days is for who want to be eligible for awards. Anytime is good to
>send
>a log to help in the process of checklog.
>
>LU5DX and other do a great job typing in paper logs, collecting logs
>and
>all kind of work to have a more acurate log checking process
>
>Anyway 5 days is too much time, would be good to reduce it to 36 or 48
>hours
>
>Don´t like to merge assisted and non assisted as a way to solve this
>problem, because next we will need to merge QRP, LP, HP and then single
>operatorrs with multi operators.
>
>73,
>Jorge
>CX6VM/CW5W
>
>
>
>2017-03-12 16:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>:
>
>> Merging Assisted/Unlimited with multi-op?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Mark, kd4d
>>
>> On March 12, 2017 11:23:11 AM EDT, Saulius Zalnerauskas <
>> ly5w.sam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >5 days after contest is very long time.
>> >Best is 5 hours after contest.
>> >Or just immiadetly.
>> >Less cheaters.
>> >But i am for ONE SINGLE OP CATEGORY.
>> >NO ASSISTED.
>> >Sam LY5W
>> >
>> >
>> >2017-03-12 04:12 rašė:
>> >
>> >
>> >If CQWW merges SO and SOA then I'll pass on that contest. And I'll
>> >also
>> >pass on the CQ magazine subscription as well.
>> >Same goes for any other contest that combines SO and SOA.
>> >
>> >I don't have a problem with operating unassisted, but I am puzzled
>as
>> >to
>> >why others want to eliminate the SO category. And I don't care if
>you
>> >operate assisted if that is what you like to do. I have no interest
>in
>> >spots, skimmer, RBN, etc. I have looked at them yes, but I am not
>> >interested in using those during a contest.
>> >
>> >"The heavy handed CC action to deter cheaters is driving
>participation
>> >away". Yes Dale, me at least.
>> >
>> >"Then again I always got the sense that there was a movement to
>destroy
>> >the
>> >unassisted category for whatever reason". Yes Ria there is, I see
>it
>> >too.
>> >
>> >And then there is the 5 day log deadline that I do not like. I was
>> >asked by
>> >LU5DX (I think) to submit my CQWW CW log a few weeks ago, several
>> >months
>> >after the contest ended. He said it would help with the log
>checking,
>> >so I
>> >obliged and sent it in 3 months or so late. If sending a log in 3
>> >months
>> >late is okay with the log checker, then why the 5 day deadline? Why
>> >not at
>> >least include the following weekend? Or perhaps a 10 day deadline?
>> >
>> >73 Scott W2LC
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >CQ-Contest mailing list
>> >CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
>--
>73,
>Jorge
>CX6VM/CW5W
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|