On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:45:12 -0400
Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> wrote:
>realizing it. One I encounter all the time is that the
>other station is down off the low-side of my filter
>response, approaching zero-beat, so his signal is hugely
>attenuated. On the higher bands, I may not know that
>there's another station located 200 miles away who is
>CQing on the same frequency, until I figure out that some
>of the stations calling are out of sync.
This is a good explanation as to why someone CQs after a
QRL? request recieved an (unheard) affirmative reply. It
is not, however, an excuse for CQing without checking for
occupancy at all.
==
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|