Hi Charles,
What u need to do is . enable nat on your AP 1000 and give u'r rg cpe a nat
based ip and enable bridging on it as well. And give the customer the static
real world ip. This works fine with our customer about 20 to 30 of them are
using this setup.
Regards
Zack
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
On Behalf Of karlnet-request@WISPNotes.com
Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2003 3:09 AM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: Karlnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 2
Send Karlnet mailing list submissions to
karlnet@WISPNotes.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
karlnet-request@WISPNotes.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
karlnet-owner@WISPNotes.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Karlnet digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. New KarlNet Boards (Hobbs, Andrew - Network Administrator)
2. customer vpn's behind wireless cpe (Brett Hays)
3. RE: customer vpn's behind wireless cpe (Charles Chia Sheng Wu)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:37:12 -0500
From: "Hobbs, Andrew - Network Administrator" <ATHobbs@bullitt.k12.ky.us>
To: "'karlnet@WISPNotes.com'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: [Karlnet] New KarlNet Boards
Message-ID: <ED866300C040D511984E0060943045C05703A8@E071000N0>
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Message: 1
What has everyone's impression been of the new karlnet boards? Are they
reliable, hearty platforms...My school system is looking to upgrade our
wireless WAN and the vendor we contacted (MapleNet) is quoting these new
boards. I'm very confident that Maplenet is trying to be helpful but I'm
looking at the fact that the boards are only 3 to 4 months on the market.
Thanks for your input!!!
Andrew T. Hobbs, MCP
District Network Administrator
Bullitt County Public Schools
Phone: 543-2271
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:57:04 -0500
From: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
To: "Karlnet List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>,
"ISP Wireless List" <isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com>
Subject: [Karlnet] customer vpn's behind wireless cpe
Message-ID: <016501c2f8ed$73ab50e0$a301a8c0@htonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Brett Hays <bretth@htonline.net>, Karlnet Mailing List
<karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Message: 2
We are starting to have our first customers wanting to setup vpn's through
our wireless service.
We run Karlnet AP1000 base, RG1100 cpe. All cpe's have static ip's and the
AP1000's in routing mode.
Is there anyway to do this without giving the customers a second real world
IP? I really don't understand as much about bridging with the Karlnet stuff
as I should, but this is the scenario. What I really want to know is if
this can be done without the second ip for each end. (right now the
customers wanting to do this are on our wireless service at home and the
office and have Netgear vpn routers at both ends)
RG has a real world IP. Turn nat and dhcp off, enable bridging. Give
customer a second ip for his netgear router.
Using bridging, can this work without the second ip for the netgear router?
For example, can it share the ip of the RG? I have always worked pretty
much exclusively with routing, so some of these bridging applications are a
bit confusing to me.
Brett Hays
Hometown Online
www.htonline.net
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:48:34 -0600
From: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
To: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>,
"Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] customer vpn's behind wireless cpe
Message-ID: <NFEFKCBIHKKFPKEALKFJKEMCHEAA.cwu@cwlab.net>
In-Reply-To: <016501c2f8ed$73ab50e0$a301a8c0@htonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Message: 3
why not just turn on incoming NAT and forward the correct port to the
customer?
-Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Brett Hays
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:57 AM
To: Karlnet List; ISP Wireless List
Subject: [Karlnet] customer vpn's behind wireless cpe
We are starting to have our first customers wanting to setup vpn's through
our wireless service.
We run Karlnet AP1000 base, RG1100 cpe. All cpe's have static ip's and the
AP1000's in routing mode.
Is there anyway to do this without giving the customers a second real world
IP? I really don't understand as much about bridging with the Karlnet stuff
as I should, but this is the scenario. What I really want to know is if
this can be done without the second ip for each end. (right now the
customers wanting to do this are on our wireless service at home and the
office and have Netgear vpn routers at both ends)
RG has a real world IP. Turn nat and dhcp off, enable bridging. Give
customer a second ip for his netgear router.
Using bridging, can this work without the second ip for the netgear router?
For example, can it share the ip of the RG? I have always worked pretty
much exclusively with routing, so some of these bridging applications are a
bit confusing to me.
Brett Hays
Hometown Online
www.htonline.net
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
End of Karlnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 2
*************************************
|