I don't know. I'm still investigating my results. I'll share my
information as I get more data.
Norm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 12:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
>
> So why hasnt anyone answer this question yet?
>
> Bill
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > Behalf Of Norm Young
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:51 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
> >
> >
> > Dan, I've tried this and I'm seeing some strange stuff. Like it appears
> > that setting the BW limit in either interface sets the d/l speed for the
> > customer, with the lowest number predominating.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > wireless=280
> > Ethernet=0 (wide open)
> > Tested d/l speed=263 kbps
> >
> > wireless= 130kbps
> > ethernet=280kbps
> > Tested d/l speed= 123 kbps
> >
> > wireless= 280kbps
> > ethernet= 130kbps
> > Tested d/l speed= 123 kbps
> >
> > It appears that traffic in either direction on these interfaces is being
> > limited to the speed set in the dialog.
> >
> > Anyone else see this?
> >
> > Norm
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Metcalf" <danm@suncorstainless.com>
> > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 6:42 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
> >
> >
> > > Its actually just the TX rate on the interface
> > >
> > > Dan Metcalf
> > > Wireless Broadband Systems
> > > dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
> > > 781-658-2075
> > > www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bill Fisher [mailto:fisher@akorn.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:18 AM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
> > >
> > > > We set the wireless side to 128k because that LIMITS how much data
the
> > CPE
> > > > can move onto the wireless network, (uploading in this case as
> > > > the data is
> > > > coming from the CPE), and then we limit the Ethernet side because
this
> > is
> > > > the interface that is used for downloads.
> > > >
> > > > Thus we set a 768k/128k limit through the hardware.
> > >
> > >
> > > So I thought that when you set the limit on a port, that it was
> > > bi-directional. Where did you read that it was one direction? In
other
> > > words, when you set the bandwidth limit on the wireless port,
> > why would it
> > > be only one direction? Why isn't this documented? Oh, nevermind
last.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
|