Bob,
Since your firewall is NOT registering that much data, I am wondering if he
is gaming with another wireless customer?
I think you should call tech support and see if they can find out WHY there
is a discrepancy between your firewall data and what the remote stats are
showing you.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:43 PM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
No, I can't say they are having performance issues but the user has not
received even close to that many bytes out of the firewall. I'm not super
alarmed but just trying to get a hold of what these values mean in relation
to everything else. The site has GREAT signal and little noise...that is
why I was so surprised at the FCS count.
-Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
> Bob,
>
> If you are concerned about the FCS errors, I suggest you call support.
>
> I do notice though, that this customer has received 1.9 BILLION bytes.
That
> is a bunch! And only 3 million FCS errors. I would not be alarmed.
>
> Do you know what yhour DB levels are?
>
> Are you noticing a performance issue?
>
> Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:16 AM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
>
>
> The SNR at the client is 43 and the SNR at the tower is 33. The guy is
only
> about 1/2 from the tower with a 12dbi panel antenna.
>
> On the remote statistics page:
> Bytes in: 1,987,965,131
> Bytes out: 80,643,930
> In errors: 3,067,386
> in discards: 1,786
> In FCS errors: 3,067,386
>
>
> The guy is on a hill and the back side of his antenna faces a noise source
> (about 6+ miles away though) but the panel has a pretty good front to back
> ratio and I can't believe that would be causing much grief. I'm running
> 3.88 on this soho and the AP. The device has been up for a little over 15
> days. He has NOT transferred that much data as I monitor that stuff on my
> firewall.
>
> -bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
> To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:04 AM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
>
>
> > Bob,
> >
> > How long the unit has been up is not as important as how many total
> packets
> > it has passed.
> >
> > If FCS errors are MORE THAN 10% of total packets, you have a problem.
> > Primary cause is usually poor RF. What is the signal/noise ratio and
> signal
> > strength of this unit?
> >
> > Kevin
> > ____________________________________
> > Kevin R. Knuth
> > Business Development Manager
> > North America
> > Corporate Office: 614-822-5275 x130
> > Home Office: 260-424-9690
> > Cell Phone: 260-402-6086
> > Email: kknuth@karlnet.com
> > www.karlnet.com
> > ____________________________________
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:25 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
> >
> >
> > Looking at the stats on a RG-1K configured as a Soho client. My in FCS
> > errors are over 3million. There are other clients around this person
> > (another one of those places where I see multiple soho's when doing a
link
> > test from a soho) but this is the wost.
> >
> > What do most usually see for FCS errors on a client that has been up for
3
> > weeks?
> >
> > -bob
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
> > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:35 PM
> > Subject: [Karlnet] Re: more link test questions
> >
> >
> > > I think I confused myself on that one....
> > >
> > > I should have cleared that up by stating that I'm connecting with the
> SOHO
> > > clients and they are showing adjacent SOHO clients in the "remote link
> > > partner" window.
> > >
> > > -bob
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
> > > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:53 PM
> > > Subject: Re: more link test questions
> > >
> > >
> > > > Here is my setup
> > > >
> > > > AP-1000 w/ ISP base
> > > >
> > > > RG-1000's w/ SOHO
> > > >
> > > > Why when I do a link test at a client why do I not only
> get
> > > the
> > > > access point but adjacent clients? If I choose an adjacent client
it
> > > looks
> > > > as if the clients are actually communicating with each other. It is
> > > > something I see all the time and would really like to know why they
> come
> > > up
> > > > this way.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Bob Hrbek
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|