RE: [Karlnet] Difference between what ping fill reports andactualTCP throughput

["Jimmy Valdes" <jvaldes@teleinte.com>]

this test is ok.. i've been working with karlent software and hardware and
the test between two Radios never pass the 4MB ,

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Dan Metcalf [mailto:dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com]
Enviado el: Sabado, 08 de Noviembre de 2003 10:29 p.m.
Para: 'Norm Young'; 'Karlnet Mailing List'
Asunto: RE: [Karlnet] Difference between what ping fill reports and
actualTCP throughput


Norm,

I believe that the KN ping fill test shows a total of upload & download
bandwidth combined

The mikrotik router test may only be showing 1 direction of throughput



> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> On Behalf Of Norm Young
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 10:10 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: [Karlnet] Difference between what ping fill reports and
actual
> TCP throughput
>
> I recently tested a PtP shot we have using KN, and ping fill reported
an
> average thoughput of 3.88Mbps.  Testing it using a the bandwidth
tester
> provided with the Mikrotik router on one end shows that it is capable
of
> only 2.3Mbps.   Anyone else seen this dicotomy?
>
> Norm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> --
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet