To: | orion@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Orion] Truth in Advertising...Icom Style |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:40:26 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:orion@contesting.com> |
N1EU: >I didn't understand Bill's calculated superiority of the Orion until I realized he omitted the two minus signs from the Pro3's figures. Barry, what minus signs did I omit? ARRL: "we determined the PROIII?s TOI to be ?17 dBm, 1.8 dB better than the ?18.8 dBm we calculated for its predecessor" W4ZV: "Orion's IP3 was measured by ARRL at 5 kHz to be +22.1 dBm, a mere 39.1 dB better" (the difference between -17 dBm and +22.1 dBm being 39.1 dB.) 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/orion |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [Orion] Truth in Advertising...Icom Style, Barry N1EU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Orion] Truth in Advertising...Icom Style (again), Bill Tippett |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [Orion] Truth in Advertising...Icom Style, Barry N1EU |
Next by Thread: | [Orion] Truth in Advertising...Icom Style (again), Bill Tippett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |