" The white house wants BPL..." Where is this fact published?
73, Don
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:30:35 -0500 Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net> writes:
> At 05:59 AM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
> >I encourage everyone to augment Ed's rebuttal - they clearly
> cropped his c...
>
> And I do enjoy morning edition !!!!!! my email to them reads:
>
> The current BPL causes interference to frequencies used by airlines
> ,
> as well as state police radios & rural fire departments. The
> government's own licensing authority NTIA recommended against the
> system based on these FACTS. The white house wants BPL, and
> mandated
> such to the FCC..all appointed.
> The NTIA are engineers and they are against BPL, in it's current
> form. Just like low powered ham radio signals can bounce around the
>
> world, so the current BPL can bounce all over the world, messing up
>
> military and ALL THE SHORTWAVES. If wiMax or WIFI had the political
>
> clout, a better less expensive solution would prevail. NTIA was
> "coerced" into later removing their technology-based
> objection.. too bad the big money usually wins. DO SOME MORE
> RESEARCH, NOT JUST RUN WITH THE EASY PREPARED STORY... Don't mess
>
> up my belief that NPR tells a correct story,,,,tnx bill
>
> I hate it when NPR gets something wrong.. they do such a good job
> of
> telling a story,,,,,
> bill
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|