Just to clarify, I was not supporting the concern, merely noting that
it was an issue raised when RFID was being debated and that those
with influence may have forced a "least power necessary" rule after
discovering that some retailers using RFID for theft-prevention were
using excessive power levels.
>
> Doc mentioned the health issues and power. Even the "high power" units
> are no where near the exposure limits. I think most are now in the 900
> MHz range.
>
> At least they aren't in an area where RFI should be a problem.
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
--
Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
FS/Swap/Wanted: http://kd4e.com/swapn.html
Free OS : http://www.PuppyLinux.com
Personal: http://kd4e.com
|_|___|_|
| | & | |
/\ {|
/ \ {|
/ \ {|
/ @ \ {|
| |~_|~~~~|
| -| | |
============\ # KD4E
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day!
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|