I would be for that, but FCC would just squander the additional funds to
something other than RFI/EMC.
Dave - WØLEV
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:44 AM Joe <w7rkn.7@gmail.com> wrote:
> But you (and I) are but .001%, or less, of the population. I really doubt
> many non-hams would welcome another needless (to them) 'tax' added to what
> they are burdened with already!
>
> How about any radio frequency licensee paying an additional fee for RFI
> surpression? Would you (we) be open to that?
>
> Joe - W7RKN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces+w7rkn.7=gmail.com@contesting.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Dave
> Subject: Re: [RFI] FW: Sweden imposes higher levy on electricity bills for
> EMC | Southgate Amateur Radio News
>
> Joe,
>
> Am I willing to pay more for a clean RF environment, yes! I would
> happily pay $600/year for a clean RF spectrum.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
--
*Dave - WØLEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|