Jim, these days there is a lot ARRL just doesn't get - or WANT to
get...... And it's becoming worse. A decade or so ago, I and several
others at different times, had solid articles rejected for "being too
technical". I believe that speaks for all of ARRL these days. Sad.
Dave - WØLEV
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 7:51 PM Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> On 1/26/2025 11:35 AM, David Eckhardt wrote:
> > Personally, I do not like the term used in the US: "GROUND". Amateur
> > radio operators make something out of "ground" that truly does not or
> > never did exist. "Ground" this....."ground" that......assure everything
> > is "grounded"..... bla...bla...blah....blah... . . .
>
> Strongly agree, David. Back in 2010, when new Handbook editor N0AX asked
> me to produce a major contribution to the Handbook on EMC, my
> introduction included a paragraph or two on the misunderstandings
> created by four different meanings of the words "ground" and the concept
> of "single point," the resulting major mistakes that result.
> Unfortunately, Ed Hare, W1RFI, didn't like what I was writing, and nixed
> it. I was told that he was ranting in the halls about it!
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
>
>
--
*Dave - WØLEV*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|