RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Samsung Oven update #4 'final' response from Samsung Corporate

To: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Samsung Oven update #4 'final' response from Samsung Corporate
From: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:09:31 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Also, if there is a group dedicated to your specific appliance, post there
as well.  When we had to escalate our order for our Jeep Rubicon THREE
TIMES to get it built (they sat on all the parts for months), I posted on
the Jeep Wrangler group.  It got us off dead stop - won't go into the whole
story here!

BTW:  If I remember from my working days (now retired) standard home
appliances are exempted from FCC regulations.  Someone, please correct me
if I'm wrong.

Dave - WØLEV

On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:05 PM qrv@kd4e.com <qrv@kd4e.com> wrote:

> I have found that posting an embarrassing note to Twitter, copied to
> Corporate, has repercussions up the food chain - they're terrified
> someone with a major follower-count will re-tweet and they hate that
> level of bad publicity.
>
>
> On 8/29/20 10:00 AM, Randy Diddel wrote:
> > Just a quick update:
> >
> > Samsung sent out another repair tech and this time they took video and
> planned on replacing the system board and touch panel again. The tech
> seemed to have a good sense of what was happening and decided not to waste
> my time or his.  He made some notes and a day later the Samsung CEO’s
> office replied with the following which is laughable. With Paul’s
> suggestion, I searched for UL tags or FCC Part 15 certification and there
> are no stickers evident on any part of the sides, top or drawers. I
> supposed there could be one on the bottom of the unit but I doubt it.
> >
> >
> > "Per the technicians notes on file the unit is working within
> specifications, and HAM Radio Frequency output is causing an electrical
> interference with the unit circuit. Which means the issue is not with the
> unit, but the equipment being used. The warranty covers manufactures
> defects, if there are no defects found with the unit no accommodation can
> be offered.”
> >
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Sharhonda
> > Sharhonda H. | Office of the President
> > Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
> > (T) 888-480-5675 opt#1 allow prompt to request ext. 30358|
> sharhonda.h@partner.sea.samsung.com
> >
> >
> >
> > I am going to make a “Mother of All Chokes” as suggested here now that
> all the ’troubleshooting’ has been done by Samsung. I will take pictures of
> it and report back on performance and any changes in the situation.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > K5RHD
> >
> > /randy
> >
> >
> >
> >>    1. Re: Samsung Oven Update #3 (Hare, Ed  W1RFI)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:54:51 +0000
> >> From: "Hare, Ed  W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
> >> To: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>, "rfi@contesting.com"
> >>      <rfi@contesting.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFI] Samsung Oven Update #3
> >> Message-ID:
> >>      <
> BL0PR16MB246869AA105491A913AACC5E988F0@BL0PR16MB2468.namprd16.prod.outlook.com
> >
> >>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
> >>
> >> In my experience, when companies feel there is some potential product
> liability, they generally move pretty quickly.  When Eaton, for example,
> found that its AFCIs were tripping, they put engineers on a plane.  At this
> stage, let's give thema bit of room and assume that they will do the right
> thing.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+w1rfi=arrl.org@contesting.com> on behalf of
> Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 4:13 PM
> >> To: rfi@contesting.com <rfi@contesting.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFI] Samsung Oven Update #3
> >>
> >> Well handled!!!!
> >>
> >> 73, and thanks,
> >> Dave (NK7Z)
> >> https://www.nk7z.net
> >> ARRL Volunteer Examiner
> >> ARRL Technical Specialist
> >> ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
> >>
> >> On 5/27/20 10:26 AM, Randy Diddel wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I am a couple of days behind posting this but wanted to update you all
> as I know that you are hanging on the edge of your COVID seats!  :-)
> >>>
> >>> I found a ?Contact the SEO? form on their site and submitted a
> detailed, friendly summary of what has happened with the first repair
> attempt along with the description of the issue and my concerns about
> safety, fire hazard, and liability. It also allowed upload attachments so I
> included a copy of my repair ticket for good measure.  This was on Saturday
> afternoon (Memorial Day weekend).
> >>>
> >>> One Monday (!!!) a representative from the CEO?s office called me on
> the phone and took down some more details and contact information. I was
> shocked that anyone was paying attention over the holiday weekend. I take
> this as a good sign that someone deems this important enough of an issue to
> make contact with me right away.  I explained that I am not only interested
> in solving this for my own selfish reasons but also for the general good
> and that I would make myself, radio gear, and oven available for any
> testing, inspection, or potential remedy.
> >>>
> >>> As before, I will post any and all developments as they come.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And, as a backup plan, I have ordered a couple of the real big
> ferrites from Newark in case this all goes south and there is no
> resolution. I am trying to run down a 12V inverter to temporarily power the
> oven to see if there is any change in behavior. No luck yet, I may just go
> get a cheap one from Harbor Freight.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 73
> >>>
> >>> K5RHD
> >>>
> >>> /randy
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> RFI mailing list
> >>> RFI@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RFI mailing list
> >> RFI@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Subject: Digest Footer
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RFI mailing list
> >> RFI@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> End of RFI Digest, Vol 208, Issue 33
> >> ************************************
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>


-- 
*Dave - WØLEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>