Too bad the FCC doesn't require ALL manufacturers to fix or replace
equipment that causes interference to licensed services!!! This
should have been part of the original Part 15 requirements!
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:53:05 -0600, Jim P <jvpoll@dallas.net> wrote:
> I notice they are on "double secret probation"
> as well, having been required to appoint a
> compliance officer, having to 'stay clean' by
> the book/consent decree for the next three
> years as well as handling, by replacement,
> any 'offending product'.
>
> All in all a trade off, as I expect the FCC could
> see they were about to (actually, they were al-
> ready, it seems) get 'tied up in court' with the
> filing of innumerable continuences, extensions,
> appeals et al.
>
> I wonder - what do they do with 'offending product'
> already in stores, in transit or in wharehouses - I
> don't recall at this point anything in the decree
> about offending product already in the distribution
> chain ...
>
> Jim P / WB5WPA /
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
> To: <RFI@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 1:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket
>
> > Seven thousand dollars?
> >
> > That's less than the cost of printing new labels.
> >
> > Cortland
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|