RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spe

To: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>, dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor
From: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Reply-to: nm8rmedic <nm8rmedic@rocketmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:08:09 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
And IBOC...


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® II, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Peter Laws 
<plaws0@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:06/22/2016  7:14 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
</div><div>To: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net> </div><div>Cc: "rfi@contesting.com 
Reflector" <rfi@contesting.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [RFI] More information 
regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the
  RF spectrum noise floor </div><div>
</div>On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net> wrote:
> This will take a looooooooong time. Lots of talk and studies and in a few 
> years maybe something will come of it, but more likely, nothing will come of 
> it.  I hope I'm wrong.


I'm quite sure the FCC is hoping that the entire AM broadcast industry
collapses before they have to do anything.  I mean, these are the guys
whose idea of "AM Revitalization" is to allow AM broadcasters to put
up FM transmitters ...



-- 
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>