To: | "'Phil Sussman'" <psussman@pactor.com>,"'RTTY Mailing List'" <RTTY@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Two sides |
From: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:17:37 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
N8PS writes: > It's all in the pursuit of maximum points. That's the definition of a contest ... > My answer is that SO2R gets significantly more points than > SO1R. But, big antennas AND SO2R gets you a even more points > than SO2R without big antennas. Again, so what? Big antennas get you significantly more points than single element antennas - I don't see you supporting a "single element antenna" category? SO2R is likely to give a skilled operator more points than an unskilled operator. AA5AU has proved that SO2R and modest antennas can be competitive with SO1R and modest antennas ... that merely proves that SO2R can provide an advantage comparable to big antennas. Until you are ready to create a [mandatory] category for any station with a gain antenna, do not discriminate against those who choose the SOmR "tool" as a way to compete with those who have chosen the "big antenna" tool. To do so is bigotry, plain and simple. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ..., Joe Subich, W4TV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Two sides, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Two sides, Phil Sussman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Two sides, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |