At 02:07 PM 13 02 2008, Tom Osborne, W7WHY wrote:
>But, if he'd just worked you, you both would have won anyway, and in less
>time :-)
Good point. Maybe he would have won and I would have lost. Not sure
how they score something like that. Perhaps I would have been
penalized for busting the first QSO call. He probably would (should)
have come out clean since he didn't goof.
In any case, I am a proponent of work 'em as many times as they want
to be worked.
> > I had a good experience with "The dreaded QSO B4 macro" in CQ WPX. I
> > called a chap, and he immediately responded with something on the
> > order of "QSO B4 0053Z 9 Nov 2008." I didn't argue with him,
> > although he definitely wasn't in my log. What I did do was go back
> > and check the stated time. Sure enough, I had botched his call. It
> > was close enough to recognize (one letter off). I fixed the call,
> > and we both won.
73,
Hank, W6SX
Mammoth Lakes, California
8083 feet elevation in John Muir's Range of Light
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|