RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments

To: "Amos, Ian" <ian.amos@sap.com>, Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>, "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
From: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:07:41 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
But different conditions would favor different variations. I think 
one macro for (HISCALL exchange) and then separate macros containing 
only (HISCALL) and (MYCALL) give the most flexibility. Then just put 
them together (or even leave out the last call for some Qs) at tx time.

Don't all contest programs allow macros to be "assembled" from 
different function keys on the fly? Maybe n1mm does not?

Jerry W4UK

At 10:23 AM 9/30/2009, Amos, Ian wrote:
>Ah there is the difference .... I use the reply (HISCALL) exchange 
>(MYCALL).  This reason I do this as it let others know I am the run 
>station so they stick around to work me or can move on faster if 
>that have already logged me.  As usual there are many different 
>styles of operating to be used
>
>73, Ian VE3JI
>
>________________________________
>From: Claude Du Berger [mailto:duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:14 AM
>To: Amos, Ian; rtty@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>
>When I am in  RUN-CQ mode, I always reply with (Hiscall) exch. (Hiscall)
>because If there are many callers, QRM, it is important to confirm to
>whom I have sent the exchange. ex: Hiscall 599 001 001 Hiscall
>Then, I confirm with (TU Hiscall de MYCALL CQ)  Why send it again...
>Already sent twice...
>
>73, Claude VE2FK
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Amos, Ian<mailto:ian.amos@sap.com>
>To: rtty@contesting.com<mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:00 AM
>Subject: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>
>I agree with Bill the CALL TU helps me make sure I have the QSO, as 
>I have been caught a few times. This a little slower but I believe 
>it improves my log accuracy overall.
>
>Ian
>VE3JI
>
>
>
> >Another comment..... after the exchange it helps band sweepers if 
> you send TU N6PE or QSL N6PE instead of N6PE TU or N6PE QSL because 
> they can move as soon as they see the T or the Q
>
>REPLY:
>
>I do it as N6PE TU because often there will be two stations, both of 
>whom think
>they worked me. If I do the TU first, they will both be gone, but only one is
>really in the log. Sending the call sign first gives them both a look at who I
>really logged.
>
>73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com<mailto:RTTY@contesting.com>
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>