RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices

To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices
From: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:24:31 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On 1/13/06, Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> wrote:

> I agree completely.  Especially when people can barely copy my low
> power signal to start with.
>
> Unless the mode has built in error detection properties (which Baudot
> does not), doubling exchanges (just the part that is crucial)
> provides the error detection.  Tripling the exchange will provide
> error correction for a sufficiently low bit error rate.  They are not
> optimal coding, but they are better than nothing.

Thank you for validating my use of odd numbers of critical elements,
i.e. "IL IL IL".



--
Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!

"They that can give up essential Liberty to
obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>