RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse...

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse...
From: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:33:14 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Robert Jonsson wrote:

>  12 or 24th.  1st or last! Does it matter.

Well, now that you ask, yes, it does matter. Although the rules will 
never be perfect or please everyone, it would be nice to at least 
attempt to make the playing field a little more level. Treating SO1R and 
SO2R the same seems to violate many people's sense of fair play.

A couple of possible solutions might be:

1) Bill Turner's (W6WRT) great idea...

>  1. Limited class: One radio, no spotting, moderate antennas, i.e. the
>  Old Way.

>  2. Unlimited class: Anything legal goes.

>  Those classes define hardware only. Within them you could have single
>  or multi op and high or low power.

>  Too logical though, it will never fly

2) Separate SO2R category. (also too simple and too logical, but really 
now, would it be *that* hard to implement?)

73,
Carter K8VT


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>