To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:33:35 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Isn't the "real" objection to PSK that is prone to garbling due to multipath? It might be ok for a domestic contest like Field Day, but how about a DX contest? I don't use PSK all that much, but that is what I hear. True or not? 73, Bill W6WRT On 6/27/2012 6:02 AM, aflowers@frontiernet.net wrote: > Apologies for the provocative title, but the lamenting of PSK31's perceived > slowness during the FD festivities prompted me to crunch some actual numbers. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question), Alejandro V. XE1EE |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question), Larry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question), Paul Stoetzer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question), Larry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |