Actually the rules are a little vague. Paragraph 5 says the first year the
license was issued. Then paragraph 6 says first of your amateur license.
I suspect that the rules suffered in the translation and it really supposed
to be first year you had an amateur license. Certainly that was what most
of us sent!
Guess it doesn't matter but they really need to clarify it.
73,
Mike WA0SXV
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 11:09
To: Larry L Lindblom; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] W0ETC SCC RTTY Championship
At 15:47 8/29/04, Larry L Lindblom wrote:
> SCC RTTY Championship
>
>Call: W0ETC...
>A few hours of playing arond between other weekend activities. I like
>the
>exchange in this contest because it lets me know who the Newbies and old
>timers
>in ham radio really are.
But so many of us have changed callsigns in recent years you can't always
go by the exchange year. The callsign I am using was issued in '96 with the
vanity upgrades, so I properly reported 1996, although my original callsign
was issued in 1951.
That said, I noticed that some of the guys with recent-style calls were
obviously reporting their original license issue year, not the current
callsign issue year as (apparently) required by the rules at:
http://lea.hamradio.si/~scc/rtty/htmlrules.htm
You were good copy here in SC. Thanks for the Qs on 40 and 20.
Jerry W4UK (1996) ex W4UKU (1951)
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|