RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating
From: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Reply-to: ed@w0yk.com
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:24:53 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Why do you let a CQ message finish while another station is waiting for you
to respond?  That's not necessary in any mode.  The priority is backwards.

Besides, I get just as many answers to my truncated CQs as I do the
"finished" ones.  It's not hard for people to figure out.

Ed W0YK
_______________________________________________

John KK4A wrote:

I operate the same way and I concur with these rules. I worked W6SX on
four bands last weekend. Hank was so efficient that I left him waiting at
least once, while I had to wait for radio #2 to stop transmitting a long
CQ. During most QSOs my long radio #2 CQ ended long before it was time to
complete the contact.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>