RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question)

To: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question)
From: Ron Brown <bctech58@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:48:26 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
It's amazing that this happens when most if not all programs for PSK allow you 
to create profiles I have a number of them one for chit chat,one for DX, one 
for contesting,etc in the case of the contest its a quick edit to set up what 
the exchange is and away we go
In a contest I don't need to know what version of HRD your using... Hihi
73 Ron VA7HZ


On 2012-06-27, at 18:46, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net> wrote:

> I sometimes feel like PSK operators are in their own little world. They 
> stick to that watering hole around 070 and don't venture outside of it.
> 
> I was operating a special event call earlier this year. I was responding 
> with a simple
> 'N8HM 599 599 N8HM' type response. You would think that it was obvious 
> that I was just interested in running stations, but I kept getting brag 
> files. I see that in PSK contests too. People just throw out their brag 
> files and don't adapt the QSO to the situation. That also gets 
> frustrating with DX stations throwing out brag files in marginal 
> conditions. The closings are also inane "Best wishes to you and your 
> family. Good DX in 2012. Thanks for this BPSK31 QSO #2323 on 20m. Logged 
> at 0142Z on 27-Jun-2012 73 OM N8HM DE AA1AA SK" Is that length and 
> detail really necessary?
> 
> I think PSK31 is a fine mode. Great in lots of situations and great if 
> you want a leisurely chat. Being that I'm not much of a CW operator and 
> have a marginal station, PSK31 is a great mode for my situation, but PSK 
> operators have become very set in their ways and don't adapt to 
> different QSO styles for different situations and it makes the mode 
> frustrating.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Paul, N8HM
> 
> On 6/27/2012 9:06 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote:
>> Never answer the ones with exchange attached. It's hard enough to
>> try and hold a run frequency with low power and answering the 'exchange
>> attached' callers is an invitation to frequency thieves....only happened
>> to me twice before I figured it out. I have a macro for S&P that says
>> "not my QRG" that I send when someone I didn't call tries to jump
>> in, usually works.....usually.
>> 
>> Ron
>> K0IDT
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <k3mm@verizon.net>
>> To: <n8hm@arrl.net>; <aflowers@frontiernet.net>
>> Cc: <rtty@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 9:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question)
>> 
>> 
>>> Yes, it's more of an operator problem than a mode problem...
>>> 
>>> ...and what's with this business of answering CQ's with the exchange 
>>> attached?  This
>>> has turned into a real epidemic!  Do these people just assume I'm working 
>>> them
>>> without questioning whether others might be calling?
>>> 
>>> ...so I send my exchange and then many of them dont even acknowledge 
>>> receipt!  If
>>> they do, it's slow to come.  I have to send everything twice to make sure 
>>> the
>>> correct station answers!
>>> 
>>> I wont even go into the ones that just jump on my frequency to call someone 
>>> that
>>> just answered my CQ...sometimes before it's even done.
>>> 
>>> How do we stop this rude crap??
>>> 
>>> Ty K3MM
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>