To: | rtty contesting <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [RTTY] ANARTS exchanges |
From: | Fabi VE2FBD <ve2fbd@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:30:59 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
I guess everybody's right and everybody's wrong. No big issue in sending RST-ZONE-TIME or RST-TIME-ZONE, certainly not ZONE-TIME-RST...??? Some folks assumed one way and some the other. From a practical point of vue I would tend to think that sending TIME-ZONE is more logical since we almost always have the zone pre-filled by the logging programs and we are missing GMT. So by sending TIME first there is a better chance of getting it right on the first take even if we miss out on the zone afterwards because of fading. Would have loved to have more time on hand but family affairs had the green light instead this weekend. Loved the couple of hours spent with u guys on friday night between a thunderstorm and another. CU in the next one Fabi va2up _________________________________________________________________ Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail. http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] ZM2A SOAB HP ANARTS RTTY, Bob Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RTTY] DL1ZBO, ANARTS RTTY 2007, Claimed Score, Rainer Hilgardt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Anarts exchanges, Andrei Stchislenok |
Next by Thread: | [RTTY] CI-V issue, Peter Laws |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |