RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers
From: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:17:42 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
We could replace the 599 with RYRY to slow things down for the old
timers....

73


Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal LLC



On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:

> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:31:01 +0100, DK7UM wrote:
>
> >
> >Now seriously:  I always thought ham-radio to
> >be a hobby. If miliseconds  count that much,
> >is there still some enjoyment  left, to get in touch
> >with friends?? May I doubt it!
>
> REPLY:
>
> It's not so much that milliseconds count (although they do) but that
> sending 599 is pointless with RTTY. I can see some argument for
> sending a signal report on CW or SSB because it sets the tone and
> rhythm for what follows, but RTTY doesn't need that.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>