SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Dupes

Subject: [SECC] Dupes
From: k4ab@email.msn.com (Larry Crim)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:47:21 -0600
Just log 'em, Cort.

There is no penalty for marked dupes.

There is a penalty for wasting 3 minutes trying to
explain to the other guy when you worked him,
his serial number...etc..

-Larry K4AB

-----Original Message-----
From: Courtney Judd - K4WI <k4jyo@frontiernet.net>
To: SECC <secc@contesting.com>
Date: Monday, March 05, 2001 07:14
Subject: [SECC] Dupes


>Hi guys, I would like to get some collective wisdom on the practice of just
>logging dupes as they occur instead of sri wkd b4. I made 1513 qso's this
>past weekend on 10 mtrs of which 64 were dupes. Most came from Run
>situations where Writelog identified them as dupes and I logged them again.
>A few came from me calling a dx station who didn't identify much in S+P
>mode. If one figures 20 seconds per exchange, I used up 21 minutes of
>valuable time on logging dupes. I s there any way to figure out if it was
>worth it? Thanks
>Cort
>Courtney Judd K4WI
>       ex-K4JYO
>check out www.k4wi.net
>
>
>--
>SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
>Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com
>




--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>