I don't think that would be proper at all. The purpose of the exchange is
to make it difficult. Same with the calls. No one said SS was an easy
contest. In fact I think it is one of the hardest and should stay that way.
The only solution to improve your copy, is practice.
Dan/W4NTI
----- Original Message -----
From: "K4SB" <hamcat@directvinternet.com>
To: <secc@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [SECC] SS Phone 2001
> I too hope Bridget will reconsider. I like the CW more than the phone,
> but got zapped also last year. Over 90% of the zaps ( don't even think
> of asking )were in the number in the call, leading me to think there
> is some sloppy CW going on. But in truth, the fact that I am far below
> the level of being legally deaf in the 1200-3000 cycle range (82bd
> down in the left ear and 78 in the right )
>
>
> I'd like to pose a question to the group. Would it be considered
> proper conduct to compile a database of both the CW and Phone
> entrants? If enough people contributed their logs ( and I will be more
> than glad to compile the database ) we should have a 95+% chance of
> getting the correct calls. Then, it's a relative simple matter to
> compare your log against the database, and let it pop out calls which
> do not appear. For that matter, it could also do sections and
> precedent.
>
> Heck, the logs from Bill and John would probably be sufficient.
>
> But the important thing is, get on, even if for an hour or so. And
> maybe we need to make up a couple of teams to compete against each
> other. And forget Bill and John being on the same team!!
>
> 73
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
|