--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 11/5/01 04:40:54 PM Greenwich Standard Time, SteveWS4F
writes:
> ARRL 10 Meter is a natural- multimode, and one we can win. I definitely
> favor going after ones we can win- it's a great incentive. WPX is a
natural
> for the same reason, as Bill has pointed out. Also, rotating contests year
> to year might not be a bad idea, but it defeats the possibility of building
> up knowledge and equipment aimed at one or two year after year. I also
favor
> CQ 160 CW as a club project, and would like to see the SEDXC and SECC merge
> efforts on this one in some way.
I meant ARRL 160 in the above, but CQ 160 CW would be good, too.
73,
Steve, K4RF
--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-path: <SteveWS4F@aol.com>
From: SteveWS4F@aol.com
Full-name: SteveWS4F
Message-ID: <8b.eb6c0af.29181b16@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:40:54 EST
Subject: Re: [SECC] Activities Directors
To: gabnjb@earthlink.net, secc@contesting.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10
In a message dated 11/5/01 03:40:22 PM Greenwich Standard Time,
gabnjb@earthlink.net writes:
> This list does not include so-called "major contests" -- SECC has had top
> performances in SS, CQWW, ARRL DX and WPX. But, there is no
> clear perennial favorite -- some years SS gets everyone on, sometimes it's
> CQWW Phone, sometimes its WPX. I think we need to target a couple
> each year for a club effort...
>
> CQWW CW? - ARRL DX CW? PHONE? - WPX PHONE? CW?
>
> Let us know! Now, back to net...
>
> 73, Gary
> K9AY
> SECC Prez
>
>
>
> --
> SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
ARRL 10 Meter is a natural- multimode, and one we can win. I definitely
favor going after ones we can win- it's a great incentive. WPX is a natural
for the same reason, as Bill has pointed out. Also, rotating contests year
to year might not be a bad idea, but it defeats the possibility of building
up knowledge and equipment aimed at one or two year after year. I also favor
CQ 160 CW as a club project, and would like to see the SEDXC and SECC merge
efforts on this one in some way.
73 to all,
Steve, K4RF
--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary--
--
SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
|