[SECC] W4AN on CQ cover

[wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville)]

My take (another lifer) is that if the ARRL really wanted to represent
ham radio they would be closer to DC, close to the political dregs.

Gary - WB4SQ

--- Daniel Jeswald <w4nti@mindspring.com> wrote:

> I have to agree....CQ is hands down the better choice.  I really hate
> to
> say it but.....IF I wasn't a LIFER with the league I wouldn't waste
> my
> money on a sub to QST.  I have thought this for years,  they need to
> seperate the magazine from the league membership.  I think they would
> cut
> costs (not needing to publish so many mags) and get more members.  
> 
> Just my ten cents worth.
> 
> Dan/W4NTI
> 
> 
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Courtney Judd - K4WI <k4wi@earthlink.net>
> > To: David Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>
> > Cc: SECC <secc@contesting.com>
> > Date: 9/22/04 6:19:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover
> >
> > I agree with you Dave 100%... CQWW is unlike any other and I
> support CQ
> > 100%. If I had to pick between CQ and QST it would be CQ hands
> down..
> > entered my first rtty contest last year and brought home a first
> place SO
> > USA 10 mtrs in CQ rtty WPX 2004 qualified for a plaque but no
> sponsers but
> > tickle me pink! 73's Cort K4WI
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 



                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail