See ARRL club competition rules below. K4SB has misinterepted the rules. You
cannot have a different club circle for different ARRL contests. Did we do this
for SS ???
>From ARRL Club Competition rules:
All stations and all operators must reside within the club territory, which is
either defined by a 175-mile (282-kilometer) circle from a designated area or
one ARRL section.
8.3.3.To be eligible to submit a score in the Affiliated Club Competition,
operators must be members in good standing of the club designated, and reside
and operate in the club territory as provided in 8.4.1, 8.4.2, and 8.4.3. The
Club Secretary or designated Club Scorekeeper for an affiliated club must
submit a list of all club members eligible to compete for the club (not a club
roster) and which level (unlimited, medium, local) they wish to enter for each
competition within 30 days after the contest.
8.4.2.Medium
8.4.2.1.Club submits 50 or fewer entries and does not qualify under the local
club criteria.
8.4.2.2.One station can submit two entries--one on CW and one on Phone in the
November Sweepstakes and the DX Contest.
. 8.4.2.3. The club territory is either defined by:
8.4.2.3.1. A 175-mile (282-kilometer) circle from a designated center; or;
8.4.2.3.2. An ARRL-section.
8.4.2.4. All stations must be located and all operators must reside within the
designated club territory.
8.4.2.5.All members must be "members in good standing" according to the rules
and requirements of the club.
8.4.2.6. Eligible members that operate stations outside the club territory may
not compete in the club competition, except as provided in rule 8.6.
>
> From: K4SB <k4sb at bellsouth.net>
> Date: 2005/04/14 Thu PM 12:24:33 EDT
> To: Schulz Jonathan <jonathan.schulz at siemens.com>
> CC: secc at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition
>
> Schulz Jonathan wrote:
>
> > Do I understand Ed's call for temp change as you would have one circle for
> > CW and a different circle for the SSB weekend? I highly doubt that would fly
> > ethics wise.
>
> Yes, that is what I meant. Appreciate Jon's comments, but fail to
> understand how this would be an "ethics" problem.
>
> Perhaps someone can explain it. It's not covered in my "Sweepstakes
> for Absolute Dummies"
>
> 73
> Ed
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
|