Subject: | [TRLog] Very Pleased |
---|---|
From: | n9br@rsg.org (Bill R) |
Date: | Fri, 5 Nov 1999 11:48:58 -0600 |
Mark, Wow you are way... WAY out in left field. I didn't "ridicule" anyone...Not you, (don't think you had anything to do with the thread...) or anyone else on the reflector... Tree knows how I feel about editing and has for a long long time. Sorry you didn't appreciate it...but it's an open forum and I think TR would be a better product if it had a real time editor. PERIOD.....end of story. If you think it's a better product without a real time editor (why I don't have a clue)... fine. No one has given me a lucid explanation of why it's better without the editor except for Tree and the programming trouble. Tact....to discuss a feature on a logging program? I Think I'll save what little "tact" I have for the touchy subjects.... 73 Bill N9BR > > Just under the surface of your comment was basic ridicule of Tree and some > of the rest of us. I did not appreciate it. It was a cheap shot. If you > did not really intend to do this I think you could get farther on your > quest by using some tact. > > Mark -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TRLog] Very Pleased, Bill R |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TRLog] Very Pleased, Gilbert Baron |
Previous by Thread: | [TRLog] Very Pleased, Bill R |
Next by Thread: | [TRLog] Very Pleased, Mark Beckwith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |