[TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat

TRLog

[TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat

Subject:	[TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat
From:	scott73@best.com (Scott Lieberman)
Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 1998 23:56:43

Is there any chance the ARRL will start accepting log.dat files?

          Scott Lieberman     San Jose, California       Ham Radio: W6CT

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:         http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat, Scott Lieberman <= [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat, Bill Turner, W7TI [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat, Scott Lieberman [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat, n6tr@teleport.com

Previous by Date:	[TRLog] CQ WW submission, n6tr@teleport.com
Next by Date:	[TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat, Scott Lieberman
Previous by Thread:	[TRLog] CQ WW submission, Clive Whelan
Next by Thread:	[TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat, Bill Turner, W7TI
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]