To: | trlog@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Trlog] Simulator question |
From: | Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca> |
Date: | Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:45:00 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:trlog@contesting.com> |
Hmm... I thought that you might be using the Sim as it comes out of the
box without a TRMaster.dta file. I've used the Sim quite a bit, using
databases appropriate to the contest. I hadn't noticed it getting
Sections wrong but that doesn't mean much because I'm typing like crazy
trying to keep up. I presume the Section fields in your .dta are filled
in. If not, I don't think TR sends a substitute. I just love the Sim. I sometimes find that 3 hours have gone by while I'm trying to get the rate past 200 and admiring how fast the score is mounting up. It always amazes me how much a stumble or two impacts the projected rate. I've been trying to think of ways of generating a UBN so that I can check the accuracy with which I enter the exchanges. I try to get anyone who's learning the code to D/L the free version, I tell them how to set it up and provide a FD TRmaster. They start off as slow as they like and, once they aren't getting too many "You got my call wrong" complaints, they can start to crank it up. That's how I got my code speed back after 30 yrs of rusting away. Actually, it's better than it ever was. Anyway, next time I use it (guess that'll be this week for SS) I'll keep an eye open for wrong sections. I could even take a TRMaster.asc and make the contents of all the section fields just the same, convert it to a .dta and see what Section names come out. Probably the only way I'd notice a difference. Either that or compare the log to the .asc I'll try the portable thing too. I didn't understand the part about having your name in the file. What file? 73, Jim VE7FO Ken Beals wrote: From what I've seen (and I'm over 2K Qs so far), the simulator does not use the info that is attached to the call. It just sends a section that it thinks is appropriate for the prefix. I can tell since I have my database set up with NCCC members, and I've "worked" some known calls who ended up in SDGO or LAX or ORG. You'll also notice that it gets confused with portable call signs (K5KG/7 comes to mind) by putting them in the wrong section. I've also noticed a few that are completely weird, but I'm guessing that's good practice for the real thing. My database has lots of WCF and a few NL and NT also. The simulator only "knows" about sections from the past (not sure when this stuff changed since I wasn't active).
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Trlog] Simulator question, Ken Beals |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Trlog] SO2R CW with Laptop, VADM Scott Redd |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Trlog] Simulator question, Ken Beals |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Trlog] Simulator question, Ken Beals |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |